Compare and contrast the destructive testing done on engineering materials with non-destructive testing done on engineering components. Briefly describe one destructive test and two non-destructive tests to illustrate the answer.
✓ Verified Model Answer (Text Solution)
Structured for DG Shipping MEO Class II examination scoring criteria.
Comparision of destructive and non-destructive test:
Example of a Destructive Test:
Brinell Hardness Test: This Test determines the hardness of a material by measuring its resistance to indentation.
Testing method:
- A hardened steel or tungsten carbide ball of diameter (D) is placed on the material's surface.
- A test load (F) is applied to the ball for a predetermined time.
- After removing the load, the diameter of the impression (d) is measured using a specialized microscope.
The Brinell Hardness Number (BHN) is calculated using the formula:
$$BHN \space = \space {{2F} \over \pi D (D - \sqrt{D^2 - d^2})} $$
where:
- F = Applied load in kgf
- D = Ball diameter in mm
- d = Diameter of the indentation in mm
Advantages:
- Provides an accurate measure of hardness.
- Particularly useful for testing materials with rough surfaces.
Limitations:
- Leaves a permanent impression on the material.
- Requires optical measurement of the impression diameter, which can be challenging.
1. Liquid Penetrant Inspection (Non-Destructive Test)
There are two different types, such as:
Fluorescent dye and
Aerosol dye methods, which sprayed on the area to be tested in both methods.
In the Fluorescent Dye method, after applying Dyes and viewing under ultra-violet light, any fault can be found by the glow of the penetrant in them.
In the Aerosol Dye method, the first cleaning bottle is applied on the surface for cleaning purposes and the second bottle of Dye follows to soak and enter into any flaws or cracks. Afterwards, the last bottle of Developer (or chalky sediment) is applied to reveal any faults on the component under test.
The liquid penetrant process is comparatively simple as no electronic system is involved, and the equipment necessary is cheaper than that required for other N.D.T systems. The major limitation of this method is that it can detect surface breaking only. The method is not suitable for use with naturally porous materials such as unglazed ceramics.
2. Ultrasonic testing (Non-Destructive Test)
The probe of the test equipment transmits high-frequency sound waves about 0.5 MHz to 20 MHz, which are reflected by any flaws in the object, and these reflected sound waves are then displayed on the monitor screen of the cathode ray oscilloscope.
Ultrasonic tests are suitable for the detection, identification and size assessment of a wide variety of both surface and sub-surface defects in materials.
The ultrasonic method can be used to measure the thickness of the material or to detect internal or surface defects in welds, casting or forging either during manufacture or when in service.