Q7 (16 Marks) General 🔥 Repeated 2x in exams
MEKG • Written Exam

You have been appointed as Second Engineer on a crude carrier, recently purchased by your shipping company. The company superintendent requests that you examine the vessel with a view to increasing its deadweight capacity without altering the ship's length. Outline the suggestions that you would make, justifying your proposals.

Appeared In: Mar 2025Dec 2018

✓ Verified Model Answer (Text Solution)

Structured for DG Shipping MEO Class II examination scoring criteria.

Exam Ready

To increase the ship’s deadweight capacity, one must increase one or more of the following parameters: length, breadth, draught, or block coefficient. Since the question specifically excludes any increase in length, the remaining options must be examined.

  • Increasing the breadth or the block coefficient would be structurally complex and generally impractical for an existing vessel.
  • Therefore, the most feasible approach is to increase the draught, which can be achieved by reducing the assigned freeboard in accordance with Load Line Regulations.
  • As the vessel is a dry cargo ship (Type B), it normally attracts the maximum freeboard. Thus, any opportunity to reduce freeboard could directly increase the allowable draught and, consequently, the deadweight.
  • If the ship is currently fitted with wooden hatch covers, replacing them with steel gasketed covers would allow a reduction in freeboard.
  • In the original design and construction stage, additional freeboard may have been assigned due to deficiencies in sheer, extent of superstructures, or bow height.
  • If any of these deficiencies still exist, appropriate structural modifications—such as adding a superstructure, increasing deck sheer, or adding a forecastle—could permit freeboard reduction. (However, the first two options would be significant engineering undertakings.)
  • The vessel may also be deficient in depth. Increasing the ship’s depth—an alteration that has been carried out successfully on some conversions—would raise the freeboard deck. This allows a greater draught for the same assigned freeboard.
  • If the ship is of the open shelter-deck type, converting it by providing permanent watertight closures to all openings would effectively raise the freeboard deck, again permitting an increased draught.
  • Another possibility is to structurally modify the vessel for classification as a bulk carrier, allowing assignment of Type B-60, which carries a reduced freeboard compared to a standard Type B vessel.
  • Although increasing draught by reducing freeboard is the primary viable option, some additional modifications may also contribute.
  • For example, sponsons have been added to certain vessels (notably RO-RO ships) to improve stability; the resulting extra buoyancy could be utilised to increase deadweight.
  • Similarly, other hull appendages added for non-buoyancy reasons may still provide additional displacement. A common example is the bulbous bow, primarily fitted to reduce wave-making resistance but which also supplies extra buoyancy.
← Back to MEKG Question Bank Upload Recent Question Paper →