Q3 (16 Marks) Lubrication & Bearings ðŸ”Ĩ Repeated 2x in exams
MEKM â€Ē Written Exam

The analysis of oil may be used as a method of monitoring the condition of the equipment that it lubricates.

(a) Explain briefly how shore analysis might test the oil

(b) State the type of information that would be expected

(c) Give possible reasons for an excess of

(i) Iron

(ii) Copper

(iii) Antimony

(iv) Tin

(v) Silica

Appeared In: Jul 2022Jan 2018

✓ Verified Model Answer (Text Solution)

Structured for DG Shipping MEO Class II examination scoring criteria.

Exam Ready
Part (a)

Tests Conducted by Shore Analysts:

Shore-based laboratories carry out a wide range of tests, often as per ASTM standards, to determine the condition of lubricating oil (L.O). Common tests include:

  1. Viscosity Test –
    • Oil is placed in a calibrated glass tube and submerged in baths at 40°C and 100°C.
    • The time taken for the oil to flow between two marks is measured, and multiplied by a constant to give kinematic viscosity.
  2. Flash Point Test –
    • The oil sample is heated in a closed apparatus.
    • An external flame is applied at intervals to find the temperature at which oil vapour ignites.
  3. Water Content Test –
    • Conducted by distillation with a water-immiscible solvent.
    • Water separates and is collected in a trap.
  4. Acid and Base Number (TAN & TBN) –
    • Determined by titration using solvents and colour indicators.
    • Gives Total Acid Number (TAN) and Total Base Number (TBN).
  5. Density Test –
    • Measured using a hydrometer in a temperature-controlled bath.
  6. Spectrographic (Spectrochemical/ICP) Analysis –
    • Detects metallic and non-metallic contaminants.
    • Can measure up to 24 elements, even from particles smaller than 5 Ξm.
    • Results expressed in ppm. Useful for wear-metal analysis and detecting contamination from other oils.
  7. Ferromagnetic (Ferrochemical) Analysis –
    • Identifies the amount of ferrous wear particles.
    • Oil sample is thinned and passed through a strong electromagnetic field.
    • Results expressed in ppm; important for monitoring machinery wear.
  8. Other Tests (where applicable):
    • Insolubles Test – measures soot, wear particles, and dirt.
    • Dispersancy Test – checks additive ability to keep carbon in suspension.
    • Index of Contamination – measures level of insoluble contamination.
Part (b)

Type of Information Expected:

  • Details supplied with sample:
    • Type and grade of oil
    • Running hours
    • Name of machinery
    • Ship name and identification number
  • Results obtained from analysis:
    • Viscosity, Density, Flash Point, Pour Point, Carbon Residue
    • TAN (Total Acid Number), TBN (Total Base Number)
    • Water content (ppm)
    • Insolubles/contamination levels
    • Metallic wear particles (iron, copper, tin, antimony, etc. in ppm)
    • Presence/absence of additives (to detect contamination or mixing of oils)
    • Assessment of oil condition: fit for further use / requires renewal
    • Historical comparison for trend monitoring
    • Recommendations for corrective action (e.g., purifier adjustment, temperature control, partial/complete renewal).
    Part (c)

    Possible Reasons for Excess of Particles:

    1. Iron –
      • Indicates wear of ferrous components such as gears, chains, sprockets, liners, piston crown undersides.
    2. Copper –
      • Clear sign of bearing wear (from bronze or brass components).
    3. Antimony –
      • Indicates white metal bearing wear (antimony-based alloys).
    4. Tin –
      • Also points to bearing wear, especially of white metal linings.
    5. Silica –
      • Suggests seal ring damage, allowing silica/dust particles to circulate in the oil.
← Back to MEKM Question Bank Upload Recent Question Paper →