Q6 (20 Marks) Cargo & Dangerous Goods πŸ”₯ Repeated 2x in exams
SSEP β€’ Written Exam

With reference to survey and certification of ship, briefly discuss the following:

(a) Harmonization of survey and certification (5)

(b) Enhanced survey programme (ESP) surveys for bulk carriers and oil tankers (5)

(c) Condition monitoring of tail shaft propeller shaft (5)

(d) CAP and CAS (5)

Appeared In: Sep 2024Mar 2023

βœ“ Verified Model Answer (Text Solution)

Structured for DG Shipping MEO Class II examination scoring criteria.

Exam Ready

With reference to survey and certification of a ship, briefly discuss:

Part (a)

Harmonization of survey and certification

Part (b)

Enhanced Survey Programme (ESP) surveys for bulk carriers and oil tankers

Part (c)

Condition monitoring of tail shaft / propeller shaft

Part (d)

CAP and CAS

Part (a)

Harmonisation of survey and certification: (Refer to detailed answer above.) Aligning the validity and survey cycles (annual, intermediate, renewal, 5-year validity) of the statutory certificates (Load Line, SOLAS Construction/Equipment/Radio, MARPOL OPP/Air/Sewage/NLS, AFS) under the Harmonised System of Survey and Certification (HSSC) so that surveys occur in a common window, reducing separate inspections, cost and disruption, improving regulatory oversight and PSC verification.

Part (b)

ESP (Enhanced Survey Programme): Under SOLAS XI-1 and the ESP Code (the International Code on the Enhanced Survey Programme during the surveys of bulk carriers and oil tankers), bulk carriers and oil tankers (>= 15 years for oil product, >= certain ages for bulk) must undergo enhanced surveys conducted in accordance with the ESP Code. The ESP prescribes a more detailed, structured survey including close-up and thickness measurements, and a review of the hull structural records, with more stringent (more frequent/rigorous) scope for older ships and specific areas (e.g. cargo hold/ ballast tank corrosion, cargo tank boundaries) to detect wastage, cracking and corrosion before catastrophic failure. Surveys are carried out periodically at intermediate/annual/in-port and are documented with a survey report and attended at class; the ESP is intended to ensure that the structural condition of these highly stressed ships is thoroughly assessed at defined intervals (with the 1st, 2nd, 3rd renewal), improving the safety of bulk carriers/oil tankers. Condition of class/provisional class requirements may arise from the ESP.

Part (c)

Condition monitoring of tail shaft/propeller shaft:

  • The tail shaft (propeller shaft) is surveyed as part of the hull/class program. "Condition monitoring" here refers to the systematic monitoring of the shaft's condition (e.g. by non-destructive examination - ultrasonic thickness measurement, inspection of the shaft/bearings, alignment, and the use of "condition monitoring" where, instead of a fixed shaft withdrawal to bare the shaft at every intermediate/5-year survey, the shaft may be left installed and its condition monitored/maintained within the survey regime, using an approved through-bottom seal and a monitoring system).
  • Types: (i) a full examination/withdrawal at the prescribed survey intervals

    (ii) condition monitoring: where the surveyor accepts leaving the shaft in place with the monitoring of the stern gland (e.g. a through-bottom seal, monitoring of water ingress/current) and periodically checking the condition, allowing longer intervals between withdrawals (a "condition monitoring" approach for the propeller shaft and its seal) as allowed by class when the shaft is otherwise maintained;

  • The tail shaft is withdrawn and examined when required (new ships; and at intervals defined by the flag/class for shaft survey, often 5 or 10 years, depending on the ability for in-water inspection and the monitoring arrangement). Records of the shaft diameter/tΓΌM, bearing condition and alignment are kept.
  • The monitoring is important because a tail shaft failure is catastrophic; condition monitoring reduces unnecessary dockings while ensuring safety through informed inspection of the key component. The IOPC? (Not related; this is class survey requirement.)
Part (d)

CAP and CAS:

  • CAP (Condition Assessment Program, e.g. the classification "CAP" of the corrosion/warying condition under the IACS condition assessment scheme, or the CAP scheme in relation to bow/structural assessment). In the context of surveys, CAP refers to the Condition Assessment Program schemes (e.g. the "CAP" programme for tankers / the IACS condition assessment) which assesses the structural condition of the hull and provides a "CAP rating" - a voluntary but common survey/assessment used by oil majors/vetting (e.g. USCG and the "CAP" for tank vessel structural condition in the classification "Condition Assessment Program").
  • CAS (Condition Assessment Scheme): CAS is a mandatory, enhanced survey scheme under MARPOL Annex I (for certain single-hull and to be phased-out tankers) and under the OPA/flag requirements for aged tankers, providing a rigorous structural condition assessment (involving close-up/thickness gauging) when an older single-hull tanker is to continue in service (e.g. within the special conditions of phase-out). CAS determines whether a tanker can remain in service beyond its normal limits; it is a higher-level combined programme that checks the hull's structural integrity and verifies maintenance and provides the continuing fitness to trade. Both CAP and CAS are used to assess and extend/limit the service of older tankers based on their structural condition, protecting safety and preventing catastrophic structural failure.
← Back to SSEP Question Bank Upload Recent Question Paper β†’